58 posts / 0 new
Last post
inertian

210 Sixty-Five Low Volume/Fuzz on Low Power Settting Only

Restoring a very early production 1974 210 Sixty-Five, did a full recap and bias (.5 volts DC across the 10 ohm cathode resistor), cleaned and tightened everything. Sounds great on High power setting. On Low power however, it doesn't get very loud and starts to sound like a fuzz pedal after a few minutes of playing. Any suggestions where to begin troubleshooting?

mm210
mm210's picture

SWITCH and transformer.

SWITCH and transformer. Switch just adds some transformer coil for low power so MAYBE either the switch itself is bad or the low power added section of the transformer is bad. Check the voltage going into the transformer from the switch in both ways. That's where I'd start. Mike.

inertian

Thanks for the lead, should

Thanks for the lead, should be 350VDC low and 700VDC high, correct?

lmv

No DC - it's AC (most likely)

Hi Ian,

if your power transformer is original, the power hi-off-lo switch on the front switches on the primary side of the power transformer. Basically the tubes are running at approx 85% voltage on the low setting (including the filaments). That last part makes the sound difference between high and low more pronounced in the older amps compared to the newer style circuit where the switch is on the secondary side of the power transformer and only affects the B+ feed to the voltage doubler.
Disclaimer: The following information is intended for someone who is capable of and comfortable with working inside a tube amp with its high voltages. Do not attempt if you are not sure how to keep yourself safe when working inside a live amp.
Start by measuring your mains AC voltage. This is your reference. Inside the amp you should be able to find this same voltage between the input of the hi-lo-off switch and the black primary wire of the power transformer. When the switch is set to 'lo' the same voltage should be found between the black primary wire and the terminal on the switch with white wire. Same in 'hi' mode - the voltage should now be between the black and red-yellow (if memory serves). If you get a lower voltage on the 'lo' setting side, you probably have a bad switch.
However, the problem may not be in the primary side. What kind of voltages are you getting on your power tubes (and the 12AX7) in 'lo' mode? Plates should be 725ish in hi and maybe 595 give/take in lo mode.

Sincerely,
Lars Verholt

mm210
mm210's picture

Depends on WHERE you measure

Depends on WHERE you measure it. Tubes are actually DC creatures. Here, do this. Measure the voltage at the standbye switch. THAT will be AC still. In high, mine measured at 245VAC and on low, 161VAC (To ground, of course). THAT should tell you if the voltage coming OUT of the PT is switching properly. THEN we'll go from there. Mike.

mm210
mm210's picture

PS

I've got mine apart at the moment if you need any other voltages or measurements. Also have pics. Mike.

inertian

Thanks for all the great advice...

...I plan to open the amp up tonight, get some measurements, and report back.

inertian

OK, measured the AC Voltage at the Standby Switch...

...with tubes in, all controls on 0, no signal, Standby switch in Standby position:

Low: 167.5VAC
High: 250VAC

So it appears the power switch and output transformer are behaving properly?

mm210
mm210's picture

Sound like the switch is

Sound like the switch is functioning BUT, you MIGHT still have burned contacts in that the VOLTAGE will pass but the amount of current required is too much for some burned contacts to pass. Just for experiments sake, you might try jumpering the switch with a wire from source to low side and see if the amp performs. If it's still the same, go downstream and check the voltages at the test points. There, you will get voltages out of the choke at 330 high, 221 low and the point h measurement on mine is 448 low, 667 high.

mm210
mm210's picture

One thing I forgot to mention

One thing I forgot to mention is that you should also verify that the +and- voltage running the IC's stays constant when you switch the power. It's not SUPPOSED to change but it's one more thing to check. Should be around 15VDC getting to the IC's. Mike.

lmv

Tip of the hat to Mike

Good suggestion, Mike. The regulation for the +/- 16V rails for the IC's is supposed to take care of the difference in input voltage between the 'Lo' and 'Hi' settings. If, however, the 16V power regulation is faulty such that it works in 'hi' and not in 'lo' - you could get weird things happening. Definitely worth checking into.
PS - in later MM amp versions, the 16V supply is of course unaffected by the 'Lo' and 'Hi' setting.

Cheers,
Lars

inertian

Jumpered the power switch for Low Power...

...and no difference in behavior.

What's the simplest way of identifying the test points to check voltage, and locating the + and - voltage points for the ICs? Any one got a photo with arrows? %^)

Thanks.

admin
admin's picture

Be aware of the differences...

If you look at the schematics for the 65 series amplifiers you will notice both OLD (1974-76) and NEW (1977-1980) versions.  The two main differences relate to the Phase Splitter driver (12AX7 vs Transistor) AND how the amplifiers switch from LO to HI output power.

On the older amps, the Hi/Lo switch is also the power switch (Center position is Power Off).  The second toggle switch (on the back) is for Standby.  In this configuration setting the amp to LO power is accomplished by selecting a different winding on the primary of the power transformer.  This causes ALL voltages at the secondary to drop including feeds to the preamp power supplies and the heaters which causes the amp to sound noticeably different in LO power than in HI power (as mentioned above).

The later versions made after 1976 or so (newer schematic) separate the Power On/Off function from the Hi/Lo power output selection switch.  The Hi/Lo switch is now on the secondary of the power transformer in the B+ high-voltage plate supply and switches between secondary windings only associated with the high voltage to the output tubes, producing either 700Vdc or 350Vdc plate voltages.  Standby is now the center position of the HI/LO switch and the second toggle switch is now Power On/Off (now both on the front panel).  The low voltage supplies to the preamp are unchanged.  This was done BECAUSE of the sound quality difference between these power modes on the older amps and the complaints that they got from customers.

The power transformers are different between these old and new models (this applies only to the 65 and HD130 series).  Because of the transformer differences, it is not possible to rewire an older model to be like the newer ones because the required LO tap on the B+ secondary winding simply is not there.

I am not saying that there isn't some sort of other problem at work here, but these olders amps HAVE to sound different in Lo power mode than in HI power mode because of the design.  Verify that the voltage at pin 5 (as well as the preamp +/- 16Vdc power supply voltages) doesn't change between LO and HI modes.

 

inertian

Early MM 210 Sixty-Five High/Low Differences & Schematic

When I first got this amp I noticed two things I had not seen on other MM amps I had played: 1), the pilot light was brighter on High vs Low power setting and 2), you could hear a distinct volume boost when switching from Low power to High power. The explanation of how the early circuit works makes it all make sense.

One problem I was having was trying to work from the only schematic I could find online (on this site and elsewhere). It appears to be a scan of a faxed copy, pretty hard to make out. However, I recalled today that my amp came with an envelope of documents, including the original tags, manual and a clean, clear copy of the original schematic! I will scan and post a jpg and pdf later tonight. Having that should make troubleshooting this gremlin a lot easier.

admin
admin's picture

Early Model Design Issues...

I forgot to mention the pilot light thing!  Many people have complained about the Neon pilot light that will not illuminate when the amp is in the LO power mode!  As the Neon bulb ages it is less tolerant of low voltage and will simply fail to fire on Low-line AC!  All of the low-power design issues were solved in the later models so I prefer those.  However, if you run these older models in the HI power mode there should not be any special issues.

Clean high-resolution scans of ANY clean Music Man schematic would be most welcome.  All the ones I have posted here were from the Ernie Ball web site and many DO look like faxes but are actually just low-res scans.  Apparently, even Ernie Ball doesn't have many clean copies of the original schematics and they bought the company!  Some of these scans are VERY difficult to interpret and you have to look at the cleaner schematics of later or other models to help fill in the blanks (as well as looking at the internal circuitry while trying to decode those schematics).

                                                      

inertian

Here are my amp measurements

Choke (red cloth/orange plastic leads & yellow cloth/yellow plastic leads):
330 VDC High
223 VDC Low

Test Point A:
43 VDC High
29 VDC Low

Test Point B:
-28.90 VDC High
-19.54 VDC Low

Test Point C:
- 43 VDC High
- 29 VDC Low

Test Point D:
1.5 mV High
1.5 mV Low

Test Point E:
0 VDC High
0 VDC Low

Test Point H: (dark red cloth/red&white plastic lead)
660 VDC High
445 VDC Low

EL34 Pin 5
-28.20- VDC High
-19.10 VDC Low

12AX7 Pin 5:
1.5 mV High
0.8 mV Low

Where can you test for the + and - 16 volts that run the ICs? And where do I go from here?

admin
admin's picture

My interpretation...

First, your high-voltage (test point "H") should be over 700Vdc.  The fact that it is low will effect many of your other measurements.  My guess is that the amp needs a cap job to fully restore the high voltage to where it should be.  This is assuming that you are operating the amp at the full AC input voltage that the power transformer is designed for.  For example, that 660Vdc might be normal for a 240Vac transformer being run on a 220Vac input.
 
However, operating the amp at low AC line voltage will potentially be another contributing factor for premature distortion when the amp is switched to the LO power position.  Low AC line AND low DC due to old filter caps in combination could be responsible for all the elements (power supply voltages, bias settings, heater voltage, etc.) likely to contribute to your early distortion in the LO power mode.

Choke:  OK for the B+ (high voltage) you are measuring.

Test Points:
A: OK
B: In the ballpark, you need to check the bias at the 10-ohm resistor as indicated on the Factory Service Bulletins.
C: OK
D: No connection here so this looks normal.
E: This is Ground so it better be 0Vdc!

EL34 pin 5:  This is the same as Test Point B but through a few resistors so it is a bit lower than Test Point B due to voltage drop caused by bias current.

12AX7 pin 5:  This is one of the heater connections and has no relevance here.

If you look at the schematic to the left of your Test Points you will see a large + and -.  These are the +16Vdc and -16Vdc supplies for the op amps.  You can measure them from the two zener diodes shown (preferred) or the on the IC's from pin 7 (+16Vdc) and pin 4 (-16Vdc).

 

inertian

Thanks for the info.

Thanks for the info.

Another member here (mm210) reports his Test Point H voltages at 448 low, 667 high, so I though mine, being close, were ok.

I am in Lindenhurst, NY, outlet voltage measures 116.5VAC, at the Standby switch 167.5VAC Low, 250VAC High (see my earlier post above).

Just gave this amp a full cap job, replaced all electrolytics in the doghouse and on all boards. This is 10th or 12th MM amp I've restored, so I am 99 44/100% sure I didn't screw up the cap job values or installation.

Set the bias after the cap job using the Factory procedure, measured .5 VAC at the 10ohm resistor.

I will check the voltage at the zener diodes. My ICs are the round metal can LM307H variety, do I pull them and measure the pins in the sockets themselves?

inertian

Measured the zener diodes...

High: 17.25VDC, -17.30 VDC
Low: 17.00VDC, -17.05VDC

The odd thing I noticed was that in Low power mode the voltage at the zeners dropped .01 every few seconds, whereas on High power it increased, albeit slightly slower, The two 620 ohm resistors measure 645 and 665, well within spec.

Bad zener diodes?

admin
admin's picture

Probably not an issue...

The DC voltages (and power output) should normally be measured at 120Vac input (usually set by using a Variac capable of boosting low-line voltages).  At 116Vac into an older model that 660Vdc is probably a good number but it seems a little low.  The LM307 ICs are not socketed at the factory so you would have to identify the right pins and measure the voltage in circuit.  It is probably better just to measure these voltages at the Zener diodes as you have done.

I am assuming that the Zeners do not continue to drop until they are very low in the LO power mode.  Zener diodes are not extremely precise voltage regulators by themselves.  Small deviations like you see can easily be ignored.   The Zeners are there to prevent large deviations from occuring and keep the DC voltage reasonably consistent. I am a little surprised that the Zeners aren't closer to 16Vdc but this by itself is not alarming.  The LM307 spec sheet says that 18Vdc is the max DC supply voltage and 17.3 you measured is approaching that.  Most importantly you do not seem to be suffering from extremely low supply voltages on the op-amps.

inertian

I'll hang a meter on the

I'll hang a meter on the zener diode and watch it for a while, I have a suspicion that it keeps dropping. How low is too low?

The problem first showed up when I played the amp on Low power set to Volume 5, Master 10, and it sounded harsh and edgy from the outset, certainly not the smooth clean I expected. The next time I had it on about Volume 3 and after a minute or two of playing it got fuzzy and had low volume no matter how I turned up the Volume.

Thanks again for all the assistance.

mm210
mm210's picture

Actually, in MY 2-10-65,

Actually, in MY 2-10-65, the IC's ARE socketed. They are in the 130 chassis that I have here too.

admin
admin's picture

You have sockets?

None of my 130 or 65 amplifiers have sockets for the ICs, they are all soldered into the PC board.  Weird, maybe you have all very late models?  My newest is 1977.  I have only seen sockets on the later RD/RP and 75/150 models that use DIP 8 IC packages.

Seeing the zeners move around a little isn't too scary BUT if they keep falling that points to an issue of some sort.  I would check the source of the voltage and resistor that feed the zener to see if the source is falling below the zener threshold.  Also, if the zener is supposed to be 16Vdc and you are seeing over 17Vdc then SOMETHING has a problem or is out of spec.  If they hold that voltage there shouldn't be a problem (even if they wander a little) but if they continually lose voltage until it becomes an issue something else is going on.

mm210
mm210's picture

Sockets

here's a pic of the inside of my 65 showing the sockets. My 130 has them too. OOPS. said it resized it but have to do it manually.

Images: 
mm210
mm210's picture

You know, does YOUR amp have

You know, does YOUR amp have sockets? A little corrosion goes a long way when you have low signal levels and maybe low voltages. Also, we never DID ask the question if it does it on BOTH channels.

inertian

My ICs have sockets. I

My ICs have sockets. I pulled all ICs and sprayed the socket contact points with contact cleaner as part of my amp cleanup process. My 210 Sixty-Five dates form '74, serial # BN00955.

Quick onset of distortion/fuzz/low volume only happens on Low power setting, both channels.

inertian

Hung a meter on the Zener Diodes

Took readings after 15 minutes, stabilized at:

High: 17.24VDC, -17.29 VDC
Low: 16.67VDC, - 16.75VDC

So it looks like the zeners are ok...

mm210
mm210's picture

I'm beginning to think you're

I'm beginning to think you're going to have to put a scope on it to find where in the chain that it's fuzzing. With both channels doing it. it pretty much means that it's in the finals so we're talking power amp. Did you ever change the driver tube? Actually, did you ever change the power tubes with another set? Mike.

inertian

I swapped in a known good

I swapped in a known good 12AX7 a while back, no change. Put in a pair of known good EL34s from another amp earlier today and set bias to .5 volt as per factory procedure. FWIW, the bias measured about 7.5v when I first powered up with the new pair of tubes (it was exactly .5v with the old tubes. Didn't get a chance to play test the amp, will do so tomorrow.

Also, just recalled that while I was doing the cap job I also replaced the 10 ohm resistor on the EL34 socket, as the original one had basically burnt in half. Used a NOS 10 ohm 5 watt I had that is physically much larger but measures exactly 10 ohms.

Don't have a scope but do have a probe I built that has been useful locating faults in the past.

inertian

New Information

Got a chance to turn up the amp a bit today, looks like its breaking up on both High and Low Power at about Volume 5 with the Master at 10. Is this normal? Doesn't seem as loud (or clean) as I seem to recall my other 210 Sixty Five got. Also the bias (with known good EL34s, warmed up) keeps wandering, set to .5v across the 10 ohm resistor and a few minutes later it's .520 or .485. Is that acceptable?

mm210
mm210's picture

I'll be honest with you.

I'll be honest with you. MINE would break up on 5! They do distort more on low though. I actually use mine and find it to distort on anything past 3.5-4 on the channel with the master on 10. I actually like it that way so I never investigated it further. I ALWAYS was going to but never did as it works out fine for me. I don't need to play any louder than I already do! That being the case, I always wondered if the gain structure of the front end was either too hot OR it was being overdriven too early. If I were to investigate further, I would look at how hot the front end is and MAYBE, try a cooler tube in the PI. I know Lars doesn't like that idea but it might give you some way of determining that the driver is overdriving the power tubes. Maybe use a 12at7 instead of the 12ax7 and see what it does. Always was going to try that in mine but just never got around to it. Mike.

inertian

Seem to recall...

...my original 210 Sixty-Five stayed clean most of the way up with Master wide open. Also don't recall the power tubes being quite as hot as these are getting...

mm210
mm210's picture

Originally, the amp PROBABLY

Originally, the amp PROBABLY came with REAL 6CA7's though, even though they later switched to EL34's. EL34's will sound different and break up more than 6CA7's. That's why Marshal used them. Not trying to steer you anywhere but you MIGHT end up trying some KT77's or 6CA7's. I know JJ makes them but have NOT tried them myself. Just fishing here. Like I said, mine breaks up but I kind of like it that way for my use. Mike.

inertian

Tried a few more things...

Tried two different known good sets of power tubes, a set of EL34s and E34Ls (which sounded great, btw). Both still had the breakup above Volume 3 when I hit the guitar strings hard.

Then I tried a 12AYZ and even a 12AU7, both reduced the zener diodes voltage to just below 17 volts, but the still broke up at about the same volume as before.

So now I am pretty well convinced I have one or more out of spec components over-driving either the preamp section or the power section, or both. Guess its time to start measuring each component...

Suggestions welcome as always.

mm210
mm210's picture

Overdriving

Well, I don't have any suggestions without being able to SEE or HEAR where the distortion is coming from. It's going to be hard to probe and crash a guitar chord at the same time. Are you using a humbuck guitar? If so, does it distort if used in the lower gain(number two) input? If less, maybe the first stage gain structure is wacky. Or bad op amp or shorted resistor IN gain structure, thereby changing the gain structure. I mean, if it distorts in the same way from BOTH channels(reverb channel and straight). that pretty much says it's AFTER the first stage op amps and maybe at the summing amp, OR, they are all crap. I suppose you could reduce the signal going INTO the driver board a little more and see if it's overdriving the back end or not but like I said, that's all a crap shoot unless you know where it's coming from and without being able to see it, It's going to be tough. Personally, I LIKE a little hair in it, unless it's REALLY distorted. Also, just a thought. I seem to remember several years ago, there being a discussion here about some amps having the wrong taper on some pots and them being wide open way too early. You might chack the taper of the volume pots on the channels. I'm just stabbing in the dark here. Mike.

inertian

Using single coil guitar,

Using single coil guitar, both Inputs on both Channels. Same distortion on all.

mm210
mm210's picture

After thinking about this, I

After thinking about this, I have to figure that either the last IC in the chain is distorting or the PI is overdriving the power tubes. You might try changing the last IC with one from earlier in the chain and see if it cleans up ONE channel. After that, look at all the components in the driver circuit, since you said it's doing it with other tubes and even lower gain PI tube. Again, without being able to walk through it, it's tough. Mike.

mm210
mm210's picture

Distortion

Did you ever get back to this and get in to it any more? I hate unanswered questions! Maybe I'll go into mine and work on it someday, just for grins. Not like I'm doing anything ELSE with it! Like I've said before, mine works the way I use it but always thought I'd try to clean it up a little. Mike.

inertian

Next chance I get I will swap

Next chance I get I will swap around the ICs and see what happens. Thanks.

inertian

210 Sixty-Five Again

Life got in the way of me revisiting this amp until now. Plan to open it up tonight and start swapping ICs, checking resistors in the driver board, reflowing old joints, etc. Kills me that this beautiful old amp is just sitting there taunting me.

Wish me luck!

inertian

210 Sixty-Five Update and Possible Breakthrough

Using a signal probe I was able to confirm good clean tone through the preamp to the Phase Inverter 12AX7 tube. To be certain, I swapped out all seven LM307H transistors with some NOS I had located, no improvement. As before, trying different known good 12AX7 tubes made no difference.

When probed, some of the PI tube socket pins produce good tone, and some distorted. Can provide details tonight when I am in front of the amp. That says to me that something past the ICs but before the PI is the culprit. All resistors seem in spec, so that only leaves some non-electrolytic caps. Any suggestions before I start replacing them?

mm210
mm210's picture

Not really unless you have a

Not really unless you have a ESR meter to check them IN CIRCUIT. You may get lucky and pull each cap and measure it with a normal cap reader and find one shorted or wildly out of spec. Or you can shotgun it and just order them all in the path. Mike.

inertian

No ESR Meter...

Don't have an ESR meter, was just going to start replacing the Mallory "brown blobs" one by one with Orange Drops and test along the way.

Didn't get to work on the amp last night as planned, any idea which PI pins should have clean signal and which (if any) should not?

Thanks, feel like I'm closing in on this...

mm210
mm210's picture

Actually, you should have a

Actually, you should have a clean signal everywhere. I guess clean is a relative term though. Clean in, clean out.

inertian

What I define as "Distorted Tone"

I use both a signal generator app (on my Android phone) and a strummed Telecaster guitar plugged in when I trace signal through an amp with my probe. The signal generator is good for finding breaks in the signal path, whereas the strummed guitar shows me how well the signal is behaving at dynamically changing input/volume levels.

On either channel, with the guitar's Volume and Tone full up, amp's Master Volume full up and Channel Volume set to 2, I get a distorted/crunchy/ tone probing certain pins of the PI 12AX7 when I strum the guitar vigorously. However, at any point before the PI, I get good, strong, clean signal until Channel Volume 5 or so, which is plenty loud via the probe outputting to another amp set to low volume.

This is also what I hear when I ouput through the main speaker jack to a speaker cab - which is what prompted the origin of this thread.

Plan to change the four brown blobs on the Driver board with Orange Drops first, and if that doesn't fix the problem, replace the two on the Bias board. If that doesn't do it....well, I'm out of ideas at that point.

Should also mention that the diode and resistor on each EL34 power tube tested fine with my meter, but I plan to replace at least the resistor for the sake of completeness.

mgriffin155

12AX7 dual triode

Hi Inertian, The 12AX7 in your amp is a dual triode and serves two functions. 1st half is a Gain stage that drives the Master Volume pot. The 2nd half is the Phase Inverter and is driven from the Master Volume pot. The schematic is so blurry I can't read all of the pin numbers for the tube. Since you have the amp in front of you, you should be able to determine which half of the tube is doing what. Pin 7 appears to be the input grid of the Gain half of the tube. Pin 2 appears to be the input grid of the PI half of the tube. With that in mind, probe again and determine which half of the tube shows the distortion. Can't help much with the distorted tone, but doubt replacing signal caps with Orange Drops will help. Question: Are the speakers OK? Good luck. -mgriffin

inertian

Thanks for the info, will get

Thanks for the info, will get the amp back on the bench and recheck. Meanwhile, I emailed Steve/Admin a GIF and PDF I made from a scan of my clean original schematic. They were too large for me to upload, hopefully he will place them in the Resource section for all to enjoy. I can also email a copy to anyone interested.

The 12AX7 tube is good, have tried several. The speakers/speaker cables are also fine, and I use a different speaker cab when testing. The ICs are good, swapped with NOS with no difference. All resistors between the preamp ICs and the PI tube test fine, so what is left that could be the culprit?

inertian

Think the Mystery is Solved

Borrowed my friends '76 112 Sixty-Five amp, it is setup just like my '74 210 Sixty-Five (High-Standby-Low power switch on front, Standby on back) and I recapped his just as I did my own. But whereas mine breaks up noticeably at about Volume 3 on the Low setting, his goes to about 6 before it starts to grow hair. On High power they sound nearly identical, except again mine will start to break up a lot sooner than his. Both have known good 12AX7 PIs and matched EL-34 power tubes. Both are biased at .5V as per factory instructions.

I took a bunch of measurements to try and see why mine is behaving the way it is (quick onset of distortion). I've attached a table of what I consider the most relevant findings.

Seems to me that the power transformer winding that is selected when switching to Low power is faulty. Unless there is something else here I am missing.

BTW, when I adjust the bias on the '74 amp to get 30 V on Pin 5 of the power tubes at High power (bias point is .325 V), still get only 20.50 V on Pin 5 at the Low power setting. And it still distorts at Volume 3.

So...just need some confirmation that a replacement power transformer seems to be the next step. If so, what's the correct name/model, and who's product is recommended?

Thanks,

Ian

I have already fully recapped the amp (and triple checked my work), tried different tubes, replaced the plate resistors, the caps on the driver board and on the tube sockets at Terry Loose's suggestion, and still the amp distorts early.

Images: 
inertian

More Proof of Bad Power Transformer?

So it seems that my '74 210 Sixty-Five is not getting enough juice on Low power (and probably on High as well).

Reported in my previous post's table that the Low setting readings at point H and Pin 5 seem very low.

Took additional measurements at point G and where one of the orange cloth wires from the PT joins the Rectifier board just outside the pair of diodes (D11, D12).

For point G (spec is 360V on High power):
Measuring my friends '76 112 Sixty-Five at point G shows 316V on High, 283V on Low
Measuring my own '74 210 Sixty-Five at point G shows 318V on High, and 214V on Low.

For where the orange PT wire joins the Rectifier board:
Measuring my friends '76 112 Sixty-Five shows 53.3 V on High, 54.6 on Low
Measuring my own '74 210 Sixty-Five shows 52 V on High, and a fluctuating voltage between 1 and 5V on Low.

Unless I'm totally missing something here, seems this is conclusive proof that my PT (at least the Low winding) is bad.

Are Mojotone's PTs considered good replacements?

Thanks,

Ian

mgriffin155

Try ohming out the transformer.

Try ohming out the primary side of the transformer. Clip the test leads right on the plug with power switch not off and measure the resistance in Hi and Lo. See if the readings are proportional to the Hi/Lo voltages you previously measured. For the secondary side, the Hi/Lo switch has no effect. For grins and some extra work, try measuring the resistances of the 3 windings and see if they're somewhat proportional. Swap test probes at each measurement in case the meter forward biases a diode on the Rectifier Board. Use the higher of the two readings. -mgriffin

inertian

Good idea, will try that

Good idea, will try that tonight. Thanks.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments